<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spring State</title>
	<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/04/25/spring-state/</link>
	<description>the real shit for those who know</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bee En Juan</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/04/25/spring-state/#comment-1012</link>
		<dc:creator>Bee En Juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/04/25/spring-state/#comment-1012</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to your DEMF coverage.
As it will be my first time in the States (let alone Detroit or the fest), any and all local info will definitely be appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to your DEMF coverage.<br />
As it will be my first time in the States (let alone Detroit or the fest), any and all local info will definitely be appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pipecock</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/04/25/spring-state/#comment-1006</link>
		<dc:creator>pipecock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 03:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/04/25/spring-state/#comment-1006</guid>
		<description>i mean, the problem is with the way most new stuff is designed. the reason i like hardware is because most of it is simple, it doesn't allow technicalities to overtake the musical parts of a track. but almost all software by definition is way more complex and too technical. 

and on top of it, the software that ISN'T like that (reason, fruity loops, VST synths, etc) and retains the simplicity has vastly inferior sound and control to real equipment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i mean, the problem is with the way most new stuff is designed. the reason i like hardware is because most of it is simple, it doesn&#8217;t allow technicalities to overtake the musical parts of a track. but almost all software by definition is way more complex and too technical. </p>
<p>and on top of it, the software that ISN&#8217;T like that (reason, fruity loops, VST synths, etc) and retains the simplicity has vastly inferior sound and control to real equipment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pipecock</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/04/25/spring-state/#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>pipecock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 03:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/04/25/spring-state/#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>thanks! and yeah, that photo is mad. 

here's how i select photos to go with my posts: i go to google image search, i type in the phrase i am looking to express, and then i find something that looks appropriately strange and steal it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks! and yeah, that photo is mad. </p>
<p>here&#8217;s how i select photos to go with my posts: i go to google image search, i type in the phrase i am looking to express, and then i find something that looks appropriately strange and steal it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenny</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/04/25/spring-state/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/04/25/spring-state/#comment-996</guid>
		<description>Seeing as yer looking for posts pipey ('n im hella bored)...
While it will be a never ending scrap about technology this/technology that, and as someone who much prefers the analogue sound, i still find it interesting that a certain focus is placed on this insistence that it isn't about the technology. this is correct, but it doesn't mean one should hate on every new piece of technology someone opts to use to get different sounds from. it may not be to the preference of some, but plenty use this new technology without making a big deal about it being "new", its just what they use. Focusing on the fact that such and such only uses old hardware is hypocritical to a point, as it should never EVER be about what is being used. People complain about the Hawtins of the world swooning over new technology, well it's not much different to the people who gotta make a point about the hard-ons an 808 kick gives 'em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing as yer looking for posts pipey (&#8217;n im hella bored)&#8230;<br />
While it will be a never ending scrap about technology this/technology that, and as someone who much prefers the analogue sound, i still find it interesting that a certain focus is placed on this insistence that it isn&#8217;t about the technology. this is correct, but it doesn&#8217;t mean one should hate on every new piece of technology someone opts to use to get different sounds from. it may not be to the preference of some, but plenty use this new technology without making a big deal about it being &#8220;new&#8221;, its just what they use. Focusing on the fact that such and such only uses old hardware is hypocritical to a point, as it should never EVER be about what is being used. People complain about the Hawtins of the world swooning over new technology, well it&#8217;s not much different to the people who gotta make a point about the hard-ons an 808 kick gives &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daragh</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/04/25/spring-state/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>Daragh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/04/25/spring-state/#comment-995</guid>
		<description>I like the blog. There you go.

That photo is pretty freaky though..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the blog. There you go.</p>
<p>That photo is pretty freaky though..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
