<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest Mix: Scott Ferguson #2</title>
	<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/07/14/guest-mix-scott-ferguson-2/</link>
	<description>the real shit for those who know</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: cz</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/07/14/guest-mix-scott-ferguson-2/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>cz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/07/14/guest-mix-scott-ferguson-2/#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>I finally got around to listening to this mix.  It's not bad, but no more compelling than Adam Freeland's 2003 &lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/essentialmix/tracklistingarchiveshtml.shtml?20030511" rel="nofollow"&gt;essential mix&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally got around to listening to this mix.  It&#8217;s not bad, but no more compelling than Adam Freeland&#8217;s 2003 <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/essentialmix/tracklistingarchiveshtml.shtml?20030511" rel="nofollow">essential mix</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merius</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/07/14/guest-mix-scott-ferguson-2/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>Merius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/07/14/guest-mix-scott-ferguson-2/#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>I was an fan of the first mix although it featured almost none of "my" kind of music.
But actually I like this here even more. It has a better flow than the first one. And you can't go wrong with 1979...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was an fan of the first mix although it featured almost none of &#8220;my&#8221; kind of music.<br />
But actually I like this here even more. It has a better flow than the first one. And you can&#8217;t go wrong with 1979&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/07/14/guest-mix-scott-ferguson-2/#comment-1344</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/07/14/guest-mix-scott-ferguson-2/#comment-1344</guid>
		<description>weird mix! honestly, this mix will maybe never be one of my favourite ones but I'm madly fascinated by your guts.
something completely different than I ever listened to in a dance-mix. I could imagine to get crazy on it when I'm drunk and bust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>weird mix! honestly, this mix will maybe never be one of my favourite ones but I&#8217;m madly fascinated by your guts.<br />
something completely different than I ever listened to in a dance-mix. I could imagine to get crazy on it when I&#8217;m drunk and bust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/07/14/guest-mix-scott-ferguson-2/#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/07/14/guest-mix-scott-ferguson-2/#comment-1279</guid>
		<description>looks really good, looking forward to rocking it at work tomorrow. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks really good, looking forward to rocking it at work tomorrow. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [mark]</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/07/14/guest-mix-scott-ferguson-2/#comment-1272</link>
		<dc:creator>[mark]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2008/07/14/guest-mix-scott-ferguson-2/#comment-1272</guid>
		<description>this is pretty sick. i semi-slept on the first mix, but the list of artists on this one pricked up my ears, and i'm digging it a lot. 

aside from minor issues with minor digital artifacts from Ableton's quantization (which few outside the realm of those who play with it a lot would even pay attention to anyway), i'm quite impressed. 

this is pretty danceable without making editing originals to make it obvious (or pandering...it's almost getting too easy to hear a b-more club behind any pre-existing piece of music).

big ups, scott.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is pretty sick. i semi-slept on the first mix, but the list of artists on this one pricked up my ears, and i&#8217;m digging it a lot. </p>
<p>aside from minor issues with minor digital artifacts from Ableton&#8217;s quantization (which few outside the realm of those who play with it a lot would even pay attention to anyway), i&#8217;m quite impressed. </p>
<p>this is pretty danceable without making editing originals to make it obvious (or pandering&#8230;it&#8217;s almost getting too easy to hear a b-more club behind any pre-existing piece of music).</p>
<p>big ups, scott.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
