<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: techno as composition-the antidote to the &#8220;soul-less&#8221; charge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infinitestatemachine.com/2009/02/18/techno-as-composition-the-antidote-to-the-soul-less-charge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2009/02/18/techno-as-composition-the-antidote-to-the-soul-less-charge/</link>
	<description>the real shit for those who know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:09:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: detroitio</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2009/02/18/techno-as-composition-the-antidote-to-the-soul-less-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-2280</link>
		<dc:creator>detroitio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitestatemachine.com/?p=629#comment-2280</guid>
		<description>Perhaps you should stick to exactly what your interlocutor wrote, instead of altering what you&#039;ve read as you see fit--since you seem to be fond of this technique in your comments.

First, there&#039;s more to MIDI than piano-roll-type sequencing.  I used very specific examples in my post to illustrate my claim and so there is no reason to repeat them here. Were you arguing with yourself in the comment above?

Secondly, you really should refrain from using pseudo academic language if you can&#039;t even stick to the most basic critical approach muster, i.e., defining your terms.  The one liner pseudo poetics also don&#039;t do your attempt at a critique of my post any favors, either.  

***

As for Mills&#039;s production techniques--you can read about them in quite a few interviews--I won&#039;t do your homework for you, though.  

If you can&#039;t be bothered to research and/or read, then you shouldn&#039;t engage in a potted attempt at a critique, of what are mostly your heavily altered quotations of ideas from my post.

Oh, and Mills makes great tracks, alongside great melodic music.  You should listen to more of his output before casting misinformed judgment--and let&#039;s not forget reading thoroughly what we&#039;re responding to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you should stick to exactly what your interlocutor wrote, instead of altering what you&#8217;ve read as you see fit&#8211;since you seem to be fond of this technique in your comments.</p>
<p>First, there&#8217;s more to MIDI than piano-roll-type sequencing.  I used very specific examples in my post to illustrate my claim and so there is no reason to repeat them here. Were you arguing with yourself in the comment above?</p>
<p>Secondly, you really should refrain from using pseudo academic language if you can&#8217;t even stick to the most basic critical approach muster, i.e., defining your terms.  The one liner pseudo poetics also don&#8217;t do your attempt at a critique of my post any favors, either.  </p>
<p>***</p>
<p>As for Mills&#8217;s production techniques&#8211;you can read about them in quite a few interviews&#8211;I won&#8217;t do your homework for you, though.  </p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t be bothered to research and/or read, then you shouldn&#8217;t engage in a potted attempt at a critique, of what are mostly your heavily altered quotations of ideas from my post.</p>
<p>Oh, and Mills makes great tracks, alongside great melodic music.  You should listen to more of his output before casting misinformed judgment&#8211;and let&#8217;s not forget reading thoroughly what we&#8217;re responding to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamo</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2009/02/18/techno-as-composition-the-antidote-to-the-soul-less-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-2278</link>
		<dc:creator>kamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitestatemachine.com/?p=629#comment-2278</guid>
		<description>detroito, i was hoping that my comments would prompt you to reconsider your original idea and perhaps adapt it to account for its (eventual) limitations. if you are engaging in some kind of research that shouldn&#039;t be such a big issue. well... 

i leave you with my final words on the matter. for once i will leave aside the ideological problem i have with your assumption that composition is per se somehow equivalent to quality (i.e. &quot;music&quot; vs. &quot;track&quot;)

as for naming outcomes, the original analogy was: 
MIDI piano-roll type sequencing = score notation. 

your main example was jeff mills and your main argument that techno can be music of great quality (&quot;soul&quot;) because it uses compositional techniques as its medium.

some flaws i see in that thesis: 

mills doesn&#039;t hold as an example because you apparently don&#039;t know how he produces his music, but simply assume that the process will involve some composition in whatever way (drum-machine sequencing, pre-recorded phrases).

this notion is furthermore troubled by the fact that there are of course many alternatives to piano-roll-style MIDI when it comes to making techno. you need to extend the notion of what a sequencer is, or how a sequencer works. how about considering the capabilities of dedicated analog sequencers for a change?

finally, the comparison between piano-roll-style MIDI sequencing and notated composition will naturally be compelling, simply because that type of sequencer was intended to do that very thing: arrange notes according to the system of notation.

since you are interested in exceptional characters (jeff mills, maker of music, non-maker of tracks apparently), i try a new analogy: limiting techno to the use of MIDI devices is like saying literature can only be written with laptops. 

control voltage is the pencil of acid!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>detroito, i was hoping that my comments would prompt you to reconsider your original idea and perhaps adapt it to account for its (eventual) limitations. if you are engaging in some kind of research that shouldn&#8217;t be such a big issue. well&#8230; </p>
<p>i leave you with my final words on the matter. for once i will leave aside the ideological problem i have with your assumption that composition is per se somehow equivalent to quality (i.e. &#8220;music&#8221; vs. &#8220;track&#8221;)</p>
<p>as for naming outcomes, the original analogy was:<br />
MIDI piano-roll type sequencing = score notation. </p>
<p>your main example was jeff mills and your main argument that techno can be music of great quality (&#8220;soul&#8221;) because it uses compositional techniques as its medium.</p>
<p>some flaws i see in that thesis: </p>
<p>mills doesn&#8217;t hold as an example because you apparently don&#8217;t know how he produces his music, but simply assume that the process will involve some composition in whatever way (drum-machine sequencing, pre-recorded phrases).</p>
<p>this notion is furthermore troubled by the fact that there are of course many alternatives to piano-roll-style MIDI when it comes to making techno. you need to extend the notion of what a sequencer is, or how a sequencer works. how about considering the capabilities of dedicated analog sequencers for a change?</p>
<p>finally, the comparison between piano-roll-style MIDI sequencing and notated composition will naturally be compelling, simply because that type of sequencer was intended to do that very thing: arrange notes according to the system of notation.</p>
<p>since you are interested in exceptional characters (jeff mills, maker of music, non-maker of tracks apparently), i try a new analogy: limiting techno to the use of MIDI devices is like saying literature can only be written with laptops. </p>
<p>control voltage is the pencil of acid!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamo</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2009/02/18/techno-as-composition-the-antidote-to-the-soul-less-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-2277</link>
		<dc:creator>kamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitestatemachine.com/?p=629#comment-2277</guid>
		<description>for the sake of readability, i shall judge myself below...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for the sake of readability, i shall judge myself below&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: detroitio</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2009/02/18/techno-as-composition-the-antidote-to-the-soul-less-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-2274</link>
		<dc:creator>detroitio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitestatemachine.com/?p=629#comment-2274</guid>
		<description>I referred to very specific outcomes, citing specific examples.  

Feel free to judge your analogy any way you wish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I referred to very specific outcomes, citing specific examples.  </p>
<p>Feel free to judge your analogy any way you wish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: detroitio</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2009/02/18/techno-as-composition-the-antidote-to-the-soul-less-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-2273</link>
		<dc:creator>detroitio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitestatemachine.com/?p=629#comment-2273</guid>
		<description>As most readers of this blog surely know, techno is a unique by-product of black and white music, so the comparison you made doesn&#039;t really apply to what I said in my post.  

What would you make of jazz, since it&#039;s a genre that can neither be called purely white, or purely black--classical orchestration, instrumentation (white) + live improvisation, time signatures, etc. (black)?

The distinction really isn&#039;t as clear cut as you describe, unless you only referred to rhythm tracks or tribal stuff, which is NOT what my post addressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As most readers of this blog surely know, techno is a unique by-product of black and white music, so the comparison you made doesn&#8217;t really apply to what I said in my post.  </p>
<p>What would you make of jazz, since it&#8217;s a genre that can neither be called purely white, or purely black&#8211;classical orchestration, instrumentation (white) + live improvisation, time signatures, etc. (black)?</p>
<p>The distinction really isn&#8217;t as clear cut as you describe, unless you only referred to rhythm tracks or tribal stuff, which is NOT what my post addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamo</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2009/02/18/techno-as-composition-the-antidote-to-the-soul-less-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-2272</link>
		<dc:creator>kamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitestatemachine.com/?p=629#comment-2272</guid>
		<description>guess i am, guess it must be a mutual experience. i am not even talking about mills at this point. 

all i was trying express was this:

composition &amp; writing are the ways used to express an idea, but this does not tell you anything about the quality of the outcome. and as such the analogy is so bland that it does not qualify to explain anything really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guess i am, guess it must be a mutual experience. i am not even talking about mills at this point. </p>
<p>all i was trying express was this:</p>
<p>composition &amp; writing are the ways used to express an idea, but this does not tell you anything about the quality of the outcome. and as such the analogy is so bland that it does not qualify to explain anything really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: detroitio</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2009/02/18/techno-as-composition-the-antidote-to-the-soul-less-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-2271</link>
		<dc:creator>detroitio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitestatemachine.com/?p=629#comment-2271</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;d compare the music Mills makes to an average kid&#039;s Twitter posts, and try and compare this mistaken analogy to a great philosopher performing the function of a classical composer, then you&#039;re really missing the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;d compare the music Mills makes to an average kid&#8217;s Twitter posts, and try and compare this mistaken analogy to a great philosopher performing the function of a classical composer, then you&#8217;re really missing the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morgz</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2009/02/18/techno-as-composition-the-antidote-to-the-soul-less-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-2270</link>
		<dc:creator>morgz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitestatemachine.com/?p=629#comment-2270</guid>
		<description>Detroitio, your post title seeks to defend the &#039;soul-less&#039; charge that is often directed at techno. I say it depends where your &#039;soul&#039; is at. 

My soul gets touched by two types of sound.  i like to break it down/generalise/simplify these two sounds:  one i call black music and the other i call white.  Techno is the strong form of the former, while classical is the ultimate form of the latter.  

To me these musics are cheese and chalk, although both strive for harmony of sound.  Techno&#039;s all about the rhythm, while Classical is all about the melody. Ya know what i mean?  

When i listen to techno, samba, drum patterns, etc,,,these are powerful sounds, part of my soul is touched, i am energised,  i am locked in,  i am emotional. 

 When i listen to classical instrumentation, drawn out high notes, drawn out long notes, powerful sounds in their own right, a different part of my soul is touched:  i am euphoric, i am melancholic, i am emotional. 

So basically, comparing these two forms of music to me is ludicrous, cos they touch two completely different emotional strings. Kapeesh?

And i&#039;d agree with skkatter, i&#039;d like to see what some some &#039;shit hot&#039; techno producer comes up with when  controlling violins, cellos, flutes, pianos etc. 

Nothing very good i&#039;d fucking wager. 

So to finish, examples of these two strands of  music that i talk of : &#039;black&#039; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iem9ojbIur8
and white http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygNuRpwZqRU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Detroitio, your post title seeks to defend the &#8217;soul-less&#8217; charge that is often directed at techno. I say it depends where your &#8217;soul&#8217; is at. </p>
<p>My soul gets touched by two types of sound.  i like to break it down/generalise/simplify these two sounds:  one i call black music and the other i call white.  Techno is the strong form of the former, while classical is the ultimate form of the latter.  </p>
<p>To me these musics are cheese and chalk, although both strive for harmony of sound.  Techno&#8217;s all about the rhythm, while Classical is all about the melody. Ya know what i mean?  </p>
<p>When i listen to techno, samba, drum patterns, etc,,,these are powerful sounds, part of my soul is touched, i am energised,  i am locked in,  i am emotional. </p>
<p> When i listen to classical instrumentation, drawn out high notes, drawn out long notes, powerful sounds in their own right, a different part of my soul is touched:  i am euphoric, i am melancholic, i am emotional. </p>
<p>So basically, comparing these two forms of music to me is ludicrous, cos they touch two completely different emotional strings. Kapeesh?</p>
<p>And i&#8217;d agree with skkatter, i&#8217;d like to see what some some &#8217;shit hot&#8217; techno producer comes up with when  controlling violins, cellos, flutes, pianos etc. </p>
<p>Nothing very good i&#8217;d fucking wager. </p>
<p>So to finish, examples of these two strands of  music that i talk of : &#8216;black&#8217; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iem9ojbIur8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iem9ojbIur8</a><br />
and white <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygNuRpwZqRU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygNuRpwZqRU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamo</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2009/02/18/techno-as-composition-the-antidote-to-the-soul-less-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-2266</link>
		<dc:creator>kamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitestatemachine.com/?p=629#comment-2266</guid>
		<description>i still don&#039;t get it. what does this analogy prove when you formulate it this broad? BOTH the average kid on twitter and great philosophers USE THE PROCESS OF WRITING to spread their thoughts, but what is such an analogy supposed to tell us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i still don&#8217;t get it. what does this analogy prove when you formulate it this broad? BOTH the average kid on twitter and great philosophers USE THE PROCESS OF WRITING to spread their thoughts, but what is such an analogy supposed to tell us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: detroitio</title>
		<link>http://infinitestatemachine.com/2009/02/18/techno-as-composition-the-antidote-to-the-soul-less-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-2263</link>
		<dc:creator>detroitio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitestatemachine.com/?p=629#comment-2263</guid>
		<description>I never made claims as to who could or couldn&#039;t produce a score for an orchestra, but that BOTH the techno producer and classical composer USE THE PROCESS OF COMPOSITION to get their music heard--one does this with a score sheet, the other with a sequencer, to write their music.

Some techno producers also happen to make great music in addition to what are good dance tracks, and some of the former examples can even be translated into an orchestral score, as the orchestrations in Blue Potential clearly show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never made claims as to who could or couldn&#8217;t produce a score for an orchestra, but that BOTH the techno producer and classical composer USE THE PROCESS OF COMPOSITION to get their music heard&#8211;one does this with a score sheet, the other with a sequencer, to write their music.</p>
<p>Some techno producers also happen to make great music in addition to what are good dance tracks, and some of the former examples can even be translated into an orchestral score, as the orchestrations in Blue Potential clearly show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
