General

I don’t live in Berlin either

A couple of weeks ago the makers of  “Speaking In Code” got in contact with me asking if ISM would like to have a look at their documentary. Myself and Tom decided that it would be interesting if we both watched the film and wrote about it from our own perspectives, seeing as one of us lived in the US where the makers were from and the other in Europe, where the filmmakers believed a  more viable  techno lifestyle was obtainable.

Just to re-cap, the film follows David Day and his wife Amy as they travel to Europe to meet artists and djs and experience their life while alternately trying to create a hub of techno-related activity in their hometown of Boston.

Except for some time spent in Barcelona, they focused most of their attention on Germany, in the cities of Koln & Berlin and a small town called Jena (the base for The Whignomy Brothers and their label). Having lived for a time in Germany myself – mainly in a small town outside of Frankfurt, and for a couple of months in Berlin – I’ll say that it can be a pretty great place to live and one with a healthy respect for and dedication to electronic dance music, but I would still disagree  with their insistence in glorifying it. I can understand the frustrations of hearing of these cities and their communities that can seemingly live techno, but those hubs of activity didn’t come about by wanting to be someone else or somewhere else. The odd bit might have been taken from here and there, but their own identity was firmly stamped on it.

I live in Dublin now and for a city it’s size it has a pretty healthy scene. But it shares some similarities with Boston in that it too has archaic opening hours; we can’t go clubbing all night long and once clubs close it’s back to someone’s house, not some disused warehouse. We do get a large amount of big names coming through, but at one stage there was nearly too much going on. A lot of people love the music in the city, but there was an over abundance of promoting going on. During the film David may have lost his arse on a Modeselektor gig in Boston but what did one expect, flying two people in from another continent and putting them on in a tiny venue . At least it sold out. Many big names have come through Dublin and played to pretty empty clubs. We’ve no record shops like Kompakt and there is no distributor like Forced Exposure (the distro company David worked for) bringing music in. There is a fine regard for electronic dance music in the city, but people who work on making it all happen have frustrating limitations that they have to work around and some do it well. There aren’t really that many attempts to recreate an ideal from another city, and any attempts are usually pretty cringe-worthy. The better parties don’t try and make it like it is somewhere else.

I don’t really see why the makers of the film had to break the bank flying to Germany and then driving to a small town to hang out with The Wighnomy Brothers to witness a techno community/family working together.  The people who forged the techno scene in the 90s in Berlin didn’t have the money to fly around to see how it was done in other places, they just went ahead and did it their own way. I can understand Tom’s bemusement with the filmmakers being so enamoured by whats going on in Europe, as if it can’t be done in the states. Yes, it will be different and more difficult due to how techno is perceived over there, but surely it being different is a good thing. And it has been done in the past.

It’s different in Dublin compared to London and it’s different there than it is in Berlin. The culture of these places and their enviroments mean that they have their own identity. It’s easily noticeable on the dancefloor. Throughout much of the film David seems frustrated that he can’t have it like it is in Koln or wherever, but we can’t have it like that in Dublin either, we just get on with it. Gladly, in David’s case he did too, the more the film went on. But at huge personal and financial costs due to his obsession with what goes on abroad. It didn’t feel like the trips to Europe had a real impact on what went on back home. I could be wrong. It could be a failing of the narrative of the film that I perceive it this way.

If for the sake of the film they wanted to show a techno community and/or big festivals I don’t understand why they didn’t visit Submerge in Detroit or go to the Movement Festival up there. Taking away their own personal preference for the music emanating from Germany both would have still been perfectly fine examples of what they travelled to Europe for. Having said that  I understand from the film that the whole project was maybe more personal than that and that they wanted to document communities built around music they love such as Kompakt, but it just highlights a – for me –  somewhat bizarre dismissal of techno communities in America. But Tom has touched on that already, so I won’t discuss it any further. But I did find it ironic that the head of Forced Exposure and one of the members of Modeselektor were sporting UR tee-shirts at different stages.

As someone living in Europe and one who’s witnessed various different cities scenes I think the film would have been more interesting if there had been more focus on what David did in his hometown. Too much of it was focused on him being tired and drained, with much of the story behind that being filled in by voice-over. Too often it would cut back to superfluous footage of some European producers living this supposedly grandiose life style, that was so much better than theirs. I know producers and label owners in Ireland and abroad in Europe and it ain’t all happy smiles and joy. (And anyways, I’d swear Robert Henke was born with that goofy grin that he permanently has on his face). Some of the contrasting footage got a bit heavy handed at times, I presume with the intention of making Europe seem like a distant dream and home being grim and unrewarding. There’s no denying that Boston doesn’t have much going on, but I feel it is more important to really look at what options one has in ones own area and going from there. Or looking at what is happening in cities closer to home to see how they do it. Not going over and gawking in awe at Kompakt’s record store. Stores like that – especially now – are not the norm.

The aim of the film was a bit muddled at times. This could be due to the personal issues that arose between David and Amy. Were they trying to highlight to Americans how it is in Europe, were they just trying to show themselves? I didn’t find it too insightful as a European. As the film progressed it seemed that David was putting on successful parties in his home town, and so what if they are small. Having bigger parties won’t necessarily legitimise what you are doing. Having big names from across the water play won’t either. This music does not need to be legitimised, no matter where you live. It is what it is.

It wasn’t a bad film; it did meander at times but other parts were interesting. There is something very lovable about The Wighnomy Brothers and they also went some way to dismiss the idea that everything comes up smelling of roses over here too, which was certainly needed. Earlier on Tobias Thomas also talked about how he is dismayed by the whole thing at times. I did admire David’s commitment to what he loves – many of us have made sacrifices for this music – but I never really empathised or sympathised with what they went through, I was more perplexed.

6 Comments

  1. David Day says:

    First off, thanks to ISM for putting in the time and effort to critique Speaking in Code. Really interesting stuff.

    I’m not sure where “gloryfing” comes from, we go to Jena to look at a small collective, Koln to find a larger organization and Berlin to find a unique support system for the music. Boston represents any other city in the world where techno is a subculture. That we ended up in Germany is both the point and not the point of the movie. Though you could say that, in the largest scope, the movie compares entire countries.

    The film is a demonstration of contrast, not pointing out how one city is better than another, but how they differ. How each group deals with obsession, fame and community. I don’t think we represent any other lifestyle as “grandiose” or “so much better,” they are just different. Consider what is in the communities of Jena (small town), Koln (bigger town) and Berlin (huge metropolis) and consider what is missing in Boston, or, the city you live in. That’s the contrast of the film.

    As for my character, that is to say, me, it’s pretty obvious what I represent. I am a dipshit. And dipshits like me exist in any city without a decent community that supports the scene. (Satellite Records, for example, the only dance music store in Boston, closed while we were filming.) This goes on in every city, and there is always someone like me, expecting to change the city or the scene, puts their life into it, and ultimately fails. We know people who can related to my character and I think many readers of ISM would also relate.

    I also think it’s interesting you did not mention Philip Sherburne, who readily admits he cannot see the artists he loves play America, and he literally moves to Europe (Barcelona, and, ultimately, yes, Berlin), in part, for this reason.

    I appreciate a lot of what you said about Dublin and it reminds me very much of Boston, and it likely reminds many readers of their hometown. I hope the film is seen as that, a study in the way people and communities and relationships change when music obsession is introduced. We couldn’t go to everyone’s town, but I think every town is depicted in one of the studies we sketched.

    And this dipshit helped organize the first-ever city-wide Electronic Music Festival in Boston two months ago, so maybe things are changing.

    People can find out more about Speaking in Code at our website:
    http://www.speakingincode.com and thanks again to ISM for the time and effort to put some considerable thought into this film.

    PS: If you want to see a movie about Detroit, check out High Tech Soul. I think someone would have a hard time making a movie about the techno capital that is better than that. http://www.plexifilm.com/title.php?id=27

  2. Kenny says:

    You may not have intended for the likes of Koln and Berlin to come across as superior to Boston but I have to say that I did think it came across that way in the film. There was some glimpses of both sides having the good and bad points but it was too much negative for you and positive for them. This is just how I interpreted some parts, that’s part and parcel of putting work out there for others to view and thus interpret. Someone else may see it differently than the way you hoped which I’m sure you understand.

    I don’t think many places are missing what Jena has tbh. You can find small communities like that all over the world. But that is just one part of the film.

    I didn’t mention Sherburne as I don’t think his story was that intrinsic to the main plot. Yes it is an example of someone ditching their homelands for pastures new but – and I could be mistaken, if Phil wants to correct me, please do – as a successful writer was he granted a good opportunity to set up a base in these cities that may not be granted to others. When I moved to Berlin (not long before you interview Modeselektor in it) Germany was not in a good state and there was high unemployment. For all the fun parties on offer it was extremely difficult to get work (i didn’t find any), and for other family reasons as well, I decided to leave. I can certainly see why you included him, but I just didn’t feel the need to comment on it.

    Calling yourself a dipshit is all well and good but as you say there are many like you around the world. I wouldn’t necessarily think that putting your heart and soul into your desires to achieve something with music makes you a dipshit, per se. And I did mention that I was glad to see you do something like put on the parties which seemed at times to go well. You didn’t necessarily fail all the time.

    Re: High Tech Soul, I’ve watched it a few times and while some of it is entertaining I do not think it is the definitive film that could be made about Detroit dance music. It has its flaws.

  3. lerosa says:

    Interesting takes from Tom and Kenny and also David’s replies.

    I haven’t seen this but having read the reviews I am reminded that in the early days it was the Berliners (Moritz and the early Basic Channel guys I think) who went on pilgrimage to Detroit to meet Mad Mike and see Submerge and understand how Detroiters were doing it. Mike told this to some of the Dublin D1 guys who in turn told me.

    It’s interesting how 20 odd years later the need to find out how it’s done moves David Day to go to Berlin.

    leo

  4. Dave A says:

    Really interesting takes on the film, thanks to Tom & Kenny, and David for the comments.

    It’s the attraction of the other, isn’t it? Bleak Germanic Kraftwerk adored in Detroit, repackaged with funk. Resultant US techno deified in Europe, largely ignored in the US. Ultimately the Berlin European descendant becomes the lightening rod for attention in some of the US scene.

    Usually, the place receiving the most media attention is where the lesser interesting stuff is going on.

    Saw an interesting Nile Rodgers interview, where he revealed Chic were so named because their perception was that an NYC audience wanted to be/feel sophisticated, i.e. Euro/French – hence “Chic”. Detroit worshipped in Europe, Berlin worshipped in the US – same as it ever was!

  5. pipecock says:

    this is an interesting point, and true to a degree. at the same time, you can look at Chicago’s history with house which involved lots of foreign records, yet ended up with massive local support for all the guys making their own music. things just don’t get done without the local support, it doesn’t matter if it was 30 years ago or today! and the US suffers from being spread out, which means we need to work even harder because “local” really means regional/national in terms of the music culture.

  6. dr giggles says:

    I grew up in Boston and what the film seems to be saying about it is true. There has been a small on and off rave scene, mostly in Western Mass, but Boston is a hopeless case as far as ever getting a real progressive electronic music scene going. The city is dominated by Irish bars & classic rock, and the alternative to that is dorky indie/alt rock and crappy mumblecore movies. Even with all the college students it’s one of the most conservative east coast cities. It’s also cursed by being close to NYC, which definitely gets the best variety of DJs in the US, even if few people go to see them.

    Props to David for the festival, a great idea and they even had a couple of people readers from this blog might enjoy, Bryan Gee & DJ Funk.

    Hopefully the film will bring more attention to techno in the US, like most readers of this blog I’m not a big fan of the artists featured, but they are mostly better than the Pitchfork-approved hipster crap that most US music critics are so obsessed with right now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More like this...

Some Recent Jazz Records

Yeah I know I promised one post a week this year. It’s been a weird year, but I’m gonna pick the pace back up to one a week or so moving forward. Today I’m gonna write about some of the recent jazz records from the last few years that have been doing it for me….

Read the full post →

Saturday in Chicago: The Soirée

This Saturday nite February 4th 2023 in Chicago is a very special event. Noleian Reusse and I have been friends for about 14 years now, and in that time we have DJed together and made music together on a number of occasions. Now we are throwing our first party together. I hollered at the homeboy…

Read the full post →